<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<link>http://openchanges.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Michael interviewed by Kirsten Dierolf: Video-cast</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/30</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/30#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prospective Memory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Method]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/archives/30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kirsten Dierolf has published a video-interview with me on her blog. We talk about how solutions focus can be seen to 50000 and a product of evolution. I will follow this interview with some some blogs on prospective memory and solutions focus later on. There is more on Kirstens website: check out video-interviews with Jim [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><markdown><img src="http://openchanges.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/000801-0043-0001-tsls1.jpg" border="0" height="131" width="134" alt="000801_0043_0001_tsls.jpg" align="left" /><a href="http://www.solutionsacademy.com/index.htm">Kirsten Dierolf </a>has published a <a href="http://www.solutionsacademy.com/Videos/MichaelHjerth/MichaelHjerth.html">video-interview</a> with me on her blog. We talk about how solutions focus can be seen to 50000 and a product of evolution. I will follow this interview with some some blogs on prospective memory and solutions focus later on. There is more on Kirstens website: <a href="http://www.solutionsacademy.com/videos.htm">check out</a> video-interviews with Jim Kennedy, Rom Harré, and Alasdair Macdonald. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Meister Video and Article: great coaching</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/28</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/28#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/archives/28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writer, presenter and former Harward Business Scool professor David Meister has a great site with losts of useful stuff that fits well with a solution focused approach. This video is an example of coaching management that could have been done by a experienced solution focused coach. Spend 16 minutes with David Meister, it will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://openchanges.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/devine-11.jpg" border="0" height="119" width="168" alt="Devine-11.jpg" align="right" />Writer, presenter and former Harward Business Scool professor <a href="http://davidmaister.com">David Meister</a> has a great site with losts of useful stuff that fits well with a solution focused approach. This <a href="http://davidmaister.com/videocast/391/">video</a> is an example of coaching management that could have been done by a experienced solution focused coach. Spend 16 minutes with David Meister, it will be worth it.  There is also an article <a href="http://davidmaister.com/articles/1/40/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The art of the professional compliment</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/25</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compliments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/archives/25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The professional compliment as used when we are leading or coaching is different from the everyday compliment. To say “your eyes shine like the sun” or “that hat looks good on you” has limited use in organisational life. Everyday compliments functions like a social lubricant. And are as such a very important part of communication. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><markdown><img src="http://openchanges.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/palette.jpg" border="0" height="234" width="161" alt="palette.jpg" align="left" />The professional compliment as used when we are leading or coaching is different from the everyday compliment. To say “your eyes shine like the sun” or “that hat looks good on you” has limited use in organisational life. Everyday compliments functions like a social lubricant. And are as such a very important part of communication. This includes, of course, also organisational life. Social compliments also have different weights in differnt cultures, compliments that would be natural in Italy or USA, would be regarded with suspicion in Scandinavia and be regarded as flattery. </p>

<p>The <em>professional</em> compliment is different, it is tool of change, something we use to develop individuals, teams, and organisations. It is also a way to give appreciative feedback, which is a <em>resource</em> that is lacking in most organisation. Therefore, the professional compliment has to meet higher standards of credibility, relevance and content than everyday compliments. </p>

<p>I see four conditions that need to be fullfilled for a compliments to be professional: meaningful, real, sincere and tailormade:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Compliments need to be <em>meaningful</em> and purposeful. The have to fit in the context. If you are working on a project, a compliment a collegue about their great recipie for apple-pie is out of context. <em>Unless</em> your are starting a café. </p></li>
<li><p>Compliments need to be <em>real</em>. They should be facts, that is, based on things we know by having seen and heard them. If you want to give someone a compliment for being a caring person, it is because you have seen or heard some caring behavior or words. It comes down to this: If someone replies to a compliment with <em>Why do you say that?</em> you must be able to answer <em>it is because you said or did this or that.</em> We need to back professional compliments with facts. </p></li>
<li><p>Compliments have to be <em>sincere</em>. You must say what you mean and mean what you say. If we are not seen as credible and sincere, our compliments might be experienced as flattery.  It doesn&#8217;t really work to say to someone who obviously is overworked and  haven&#8217;t slept well, that they look fresh today. It <em>might</em> work to say we are impressed that the took the time to come, given that they have so much to do. </p></li>
<li><p>Compliments have to be <em>tailormade</em> The must sound right in the ears of the reciever. The simplest way to do this is to use the words and language the other person. It must also reflect the kind of relationsship we have. I can’t use the same langauge talking to a kid or to a adult employee. When my son learned to ride a bike, I did’t tell him that I was truly impressed by his recent progress in developing coordination skills. And when a collegue writes a great report, I will not tell here she is a good girl. </p></li>
</ol>

<p>To sum up. Everyday compliments is an important part of communication and social life since it a social lubricant and builds relationsship. An organisation is, of course, also a form of social life, and needs to be lubricated. But is a special kind of social life, though, where we create things together; we have projects, products, customers, budgets, and so on. Things need to get done. Here, compliments play an important part too: as a change tool, as a way of coaching and motivating, and as a way to create positive, constructive feedback. The professional compliment must therefore,  if we want it to work, be meaningful, real, sincere, and tailormade </markdown></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wiseman&#8217;s four principles of luck in solutions focused work (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/20</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Affirming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Luck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prospective Memory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/archives/20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people would say they are lucky, other would say the are plagued by unluck. Is this true, in real life? What magical forces of the universe would bestow one individual with luck and another with bad luck? Is this just a myths about human life that we could ask the TV-Myth-busters to demolish?. Oddly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><markdown><img src="http://openchanges.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/fourleafclover1.jpg" border="0" height="94" width="143" alt="fourleafclover.jpg" align="left" />Some people would say they are lucky, other would say the are plagued by unluck. Is this true, in real life? What magical forces of the universe would bestow one individual with luck and another with bad luck? Is this just a myths about human life that we could ask the TV-Myth-busters to demolish?. Oddly enough, the English psychologist <a href="http://www.richardwiseman.com/">Richard Wiseman</a>, with a reputation as a scientific myth-buster, says that there is some truth in this. Some people actually have, empirically, more luck than others. But there is no magic, blessing, or cursing involved. On the contrary, lucky people are simply using different ways of thinking and behaving. These behaviours, among other things,  invite benevolent change and increase the possibility that they will notice and take advantage of chance. Interestingly, If this is the case, then it might be possible to extract these behaviours and teach them to un-lucky people. When the unlucky person behaves, and thinks,  like a lucky person, there luck might change. </p>

<p>I will, in a series of four blogs, discuss how Wisemans findings fit with a solutions focused approach, and how the approach actually is something of a luck school in it self. </p>

<p>(BTW, the first thing to notice is that Wiseman’s luck school idea in itself is an example of the solutions focused approach. One of the central ideas of SF is: <em>find out what works, and do more of it</em>. Wiseman extracts what seems to make people lucky, and then teaches other people to do more of that. This is similar to the <a href="http://www.positivedeviance.org/">Positive Deviance approach to foreign aid.) </a></p>

<p>Wiseman described the four factors of an <a href="http://www.richardwiseman.com/resources/The_Luck_Factor.pdf">article</a> in Sceptical Inquirer (May/June, 2003)</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>Lucky people generate their own good fortune via four basic principles.  They are skilled at 
  creating and noticing chance opportunities, make lucky decisions by listening to their intuition,create self-fulfilling prophesies via positive expectations, and adopt a resilient attitude that transforms bad luck into good.</em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>In this blog, we&#8217;ll look at the first principle: Create and notice chance opportunities</p>

<p>Wiseman conducted an interesting experiment. He gave lucky and un-lucky people a newspaper and asked them to count the number of pictures in it. What he didn&#8217;t tell them that there was a message on page two of the magazine saying &#8220;Stop counting - There are 43 picture in this newspaper&#8221;. The lucky people tended to see this message and was done in a few seconds. The unlucky people spent several minutes working to count the numbers. The luck here was not a matter of chance. It was a matter of awareness. The lucky people, without realising it, used a technique we can learn and develop: our ability to notice the unexpected and pattern-breaking, and not to get locked down in tunnel-vision. </p>

<p>In solutions focused work we often use techniques to help us notice change and possibilities. A classical technique often used in solutions focused therapy is easily adaptable to a small everyday experiment: </p>

<p><em>For the next few days, notice what you do, and what happens, that is good for you, and that you want to see happen more. Make a note of it in the back of your head or an paper</em></p>

<p>The idea of <em>exceptions</em> or, as I prefer to call it <em>hidden success</em> is another tool that works with this principle. If a solutions focused coach is asked to help a team with co-operation problems he or she might use a question like <em>when was the last time you co-operated well or better</em> After an initial suprise people often recollects moments of success hidden among the problems, like Wisemans message among the pictures. Often, we are too busy with problem (or counting) to the the fragments of success that give us clues to solutions. When we have identified such hidden success, we often follow up with <a href="http://openchanges.com/archives/13">affirming questions</a> like <em>How did you manage to do that?</em> Which helps us to build on what works. </p>

<p>An experiment you might like to try is: </p>

<p><em>Think back on the week until you find something that you did, or that happened, that was useful for you. Then ask yourself how you made that happen. How did you do to take the opportunity? What did you learn from it?</em></p>

<p>With the solutions focused approach we can increase our possibilities in the moment and in the future by noticing the chance opportunities that always happen. We can also use the past by using our lucky eyes to pick up the possibilities that was lying in front of us, but we were to busy to notice or that discounted by view them as exceptions. This increases our possibility-field to include the unpredictable changes that always happen. </p>

<p>In the next blog in this series we will look at the third principle: create self-fulfilling prophesies via positive expectations. There are also some ideas on luck and chance in a <a href="http://openchanges.com/archives/5">previous blog</a></p>

<p></markdown></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listening differently: the two sides of a compliment</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/15</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/15#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compliments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Method]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/blog/archives/15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It is often assumed that we give compliments and acknowledgement for the benifit of the reciever. But consider the other side of the coin: what does giving compliment do to you the person giving compliments. I would like to argue that giving professional compliments is as important for the giver as the reciever, but in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><markdown>
<img src="http://openchanges.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/stockxpertcom-id168905-size1.jpg" border="0" height="95" width="140" alt="stockxpertcom_id168905_size1.jpg" align="left" />It is often assumed that we give compliments and acknowledgement for the benifit of the reciever. But consider the other side of the coin: what does giving compliment do to you the person giving compliments. I would like to argue that giving professional compliments is as important for the giver as the reciever, but in different ways. </p>

<p>Rayya Ghoul once shoved me a training exercise called nag-nag-nag which I’ve found immensly useful. Perhaps you would like to try a little experiment based on this exercise. The next time you encounter someone who nags and complains about something. (and preferably when they are not nagging about you, that makes the experiment too difficult) As they are complaining, keep quiet for a few minutes and just listen, don’t comment either positively or negatively. After a few minutes, when there is a gap in the nagging, do some magic. The magic is to give the person <em>sincere</em> compliments about things you <em>heard</em> in the nagging. That’s right: sincere well-grounded compliments. And real ones too, they should be derived from someting in what the person is saying.</p>

<p>…could you do it? Amazingly this is quite possible to do. If you did the experiment, how did you find compliments to give? You probably did so by <em>listening differently</em>. You hear resources: commitment, observational skills, sense of what’s right, willingness to do the right thing, coping skills, ambitions, aspirations, honesty etc. Would it be as easy to hear these things if you had not decided to give sincere compliments after a while? Probably not. Your ears would be hurting from all the negativity, itching to either encourage or discourage. So, the commitment to give sincere, real, compliments, tunes you in to seeing and hearing resources, the positive in the negative. 
In this sense the solution focused practise to end a conversation with acknowledgement, validation, and compliments works <em>both ways</em>. For the giver, it trains you to <em>listen differently</em> be receptive to resourses, skills and positive intentions. For the reciever, if it is well done, it acknowledges and validates.</p>

<p>So, the next time you meet someone who nags and complains. Be thankful for that they give you the opportunity to train yourself in constructive receptivity. And this is something completely different than new-agy positity. Remember, it is the positive that is included in the negative. The negative is still there. But it is this positivity that we need to cope with the negative. 
</markdown></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affirming Questions: how to ask questions and give compliments at the same time</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/13</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/13#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affirming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Compliments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Method]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/blog/archives/13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody doubts the value in using compliments, acknowledgement and validation in solution focused work. But sometimes it doesn&#8217;t work as well as we would like. Not everyone in every situation responds well to compliments. It might feel or be experienced as tacky or patronising. Another problem with compliments is that they are short-range. The compliment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><div class="image-left"><img class="imageStyle" alt="ffirmingquestionshowtosk_1" src="http://openchanges.com/files/affirming-questions-how-to-ask_1.jpg"width="221" height="148" align="left"/></div>Nobody doubts the value in using compliments, acknowledgement and validation in solution focused work. But sometimes it doesn&rsquo;t work as well as we would like. Not everyone in every situation responds well to compliments. It might feel or be experienced as tacky or patronising. Another problem with compliments is that they are short-range. The compliment depends on the leader or coach giving it. It is, in a sense, from the outside or above. The nature of relationship also affects how and if compliments work. If a person do not trust me, why would they trust my compliments? If they feel threatened by me, they might feel that the compliment might be a trick of some kind. What to do in those instances? One way is to use questions instead: a particular type of questions I call &ldquo;Affirming questions&rdquo;. <div style="display: inline;color:#001fe2;"><u><a href="http://solutionfocusedchange.blogspot.com/">Coert Visser</a></u></div > makes a similar point in a <div style="display: inline;color:#001fe2;"><u><a href="http://solutionfocusedchange.blogspot.com/2007/04/why-is-acknowledgement-important.html">recent blog</a></u></div >, where he talk about acknowledging and complimenting in an implicit way by using questions. In this blog, I hope to extend a bit on these ideas by introducing the &ldquo;affirming question&rdquo; concept<br /><br />The affirming questions are a category of solution focused questions that:<br /><br />(1) develop knowledge of successes<br />(2)  contains implicit compliments which affirms resources</markdown><br /><br />You can say that the questions contains a positive statement about how I see the other person. Affirming questions are often much more effective than simple direct compliments. On reason for this is that they are not experienced as a compliment but has a similar uplifting quality. Another reason is that they affirm by inviting people to explore and develop successes, choices and achievements.<br /><br />A wonderful example is the seemingly ordinary question: &#8220;How did you do that?&#8221;. Using this question as a response to a person having done something successfully we are actually doing several things at the same time. Firstly, we help the person describe how they did it, which will be helpful knowledge if they should want to do it again. Secondly, we get information, which we would get if we had just said, &ldquo;well, done, splendid!&rdquo;. We now have a dialogue about success. Thirdly, I give the person a hidden compliment, since the questions presupposes or affirms something about the person that tells them how I see them. The resource that is implicit is agency. The Implicit statement or affirmation is &ldquo;To me, you are a person that can make things happen&rdquo;. The resource that is affirmed is agency.<br /><br />Take the questions: &#8220;How did you decide it was the right thing to do?&#8221; The implicit resources here are (1) the ability to make well-grounded choices, (2) ability to draw useful conclusions, and (3) the aspiration to do the right thing. The implicit statement is: &ldquo;I see you as a person who does things carefully, you are the kind of person who makes well-grounded choices and commitments&rdquo;<br /><br />Another question: &ldquo;What did you learn from that?&rdquo;. An implicit statement here is &ldquo;I see you as a person how learns from you experiences. Someone who uses their experiences constructively&rdquo; Naturaly, this affirms the resource learning ability<br />Or this one, one of my favourites: &ldquo;What was helpful&rdquo;. This actually presupposes the complex statement: &ldquo;I see you as a person who is smart enough to see that you need help sometimes, and not only that, you are smart enough to get help, and if that wasn&rsquo;t enough you also use that help. That&rsquo;s really impressive&rdquo;<br /><br />As you can see, these small question do much more that is apparent on the surface. You actually give a compliment by the way of a question, at the same time as you unfold useful knowledge, experience and skills. The answers can be useful for you as a leader too. When a person or team in your organisation achieves something. How he or she did it is highly valuable information for you, your organisation and your projects.<br /><br />These questions are most often seen as follow-up questions. But I have found them so valuable that I want to see them as a special category of questions in solution focused work: Affirming questions. On par with scaling questions and miracle questions. &#8232;And, don&rsquo;t forget, straight compliment are important too, are work well in combination with affirming questions. The late master of SF Insoo Kim Berg often said: &ldquo;Wow, that&rsquo;s amazing&hellip;how did you do that?&rdquo;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael on youtube</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/12</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/blog/archives/12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve started a youtube page with videos both of and solution focused reflections and music. Feel free to check the videos at the youtube page or here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve started a youtube page with videos both of and solution focused reflections and music. Feel free to check the videos at the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/michaelhjerth" rel="self">youtube page</a> or <a href="media/index.html" rel="self" title="Media">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solution Focused Management: new book</title>
		<link>http://openchanges.com/archives/11</link>
		<comments>http://openchanges.com/archives/11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michaelhjerth</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openchanges.com/blog/archives/11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael and Mark Mckergow has written a chapter called &#8220;Learning how to act simply in complex situations&#8221; in this fantastic new book. Find a pdf with a description and ordering information here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div style="display: inline;font-size:13px; ">Michael and Mark Mckergow has written a chapter called &#8220;Learning how to act simply in complex situations&#8221; in this fantastic new book. Find a pdf with a description and ordering information </div ><div style="display: inline;font-size:13px; "><a href="http://www.korn.ch/sol2006/remainings/bookinfo.pdf" rel="self">here</a></div ></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://openchanges.com/archives/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
